My thoughts, regarding the EOTO projects of others. I will update this post with my responses.
Response #1: Virtually Real
Ah, Second Life. The enigmatic online game that grew into a phenomenon, and then into a subculture. Cindy Anderson writes about second life in her blog, The Write Reason. I have always been fascinated by the idea of Second Life… though I’ve never gotten into it (and I will probably keep it that way). Cindy writes about the evolution of Second Life, as well as the possibilities for entrepreneurship, marketing, and socialization that it brings with it. The Baltimore Sun writes a good article, cited by Cindy, about how people are making a living in Second Life. She cites many other interesting articles that discuss the possibilities of Second Life, including some overlooked benefits such as the opportunity for people with Autism or other different abilities to communicate easily and comfortably.
Second life is initially off-putting to many, given the fact that it allows almost anyone to portray themselves as almost anything; while maintaining a world with a system of commerce etc. that treads a shade too close to reality for comfort. However, Cindy has opened my eyes to the possibilities that Second Life offers for communication, social networking, and the establishment of online communities.
However, I will continue to politely abstain from Second Life.
Response #2: Blog Phobia
As a man who approached blogs with some trepidation, the title of this article intrigued me. Alas, upon reading it, I discovered that the phobia is not for the common man, but instead for newspapers. As I too fear for print media, I decided to read on.
This article, located on Amanda Clark’s blog, discusses the impact of blogs on print media, and the possible decline of newspapers and journalists that may result from the proliferation of blogs. Although I am not a journalist, the collapse of an entire field based on the work of some bloggers is frightening to me anyways. I appreciate blogs for what they are, but as Amanda writes, even some reporters blogs are rife with slant and opinion, which a regular article should not have. Regardless of whether or not blogs are having an impact on the industry, blogging journalists should be aware that many people are now turning to blogs for their news; and therefore the content of the blog should remain newsworthy. Amanda does express her secret desire that blogs will someday disappear, leaving only the goods ones in their wake, and I would have to agree with that.
Response #3: Internet Resources for Disaster Preparedness and Response
Marina Calabrese writes about the use of the internet in disaster response. Marina examines some past disasters, namely 9/11; a crisis during which the internet was the only communication tool still functioning. Marina writes:
“The Internet has proven to be a quick, secure, and efficient way to communicate during a crisis. While it should not replace traditional communication avenues (television, radio, telephone), the Internet has proven to be an excellent supplemental resource in the distribution and acquisition of pertinent information during a catastrophic event. Government agencies should continue to look for ways to utilize the Internet when planning for, reacting to, and in the aftermath of a disaster.”
Indeed, all of this is true. And the internet is a good tool for distributing large amounts of information quickly. But how efficient can it really be? Some concerns are addressed within the blog post, and I tend to agree with all of them; especially that connectivity could be difficult or impossible to achieve and maintain during a huge disaster or catastrophe. Another concern that I would add to the list would be whether or not those responding to the disaster would have internet access, or a computer for that matter. I think that the government and emergency response groups should seek out other ways of giving and receiving information, and not hope that the internet is the cure-all.
Response #4: Individual Privacy in an Online World
Jason Voorhees’ blog features an article about the issue of privacy in the online world (as one might glean from the title). In this article, he discusses the idea of the “digital footprint”, and how it relates to the fact that one cannot navigate anywhere on the internet without leaving behind some information. Also, he discusses how this is issue is only gaining momentum, as people are beginning to wirelessly access the internet in locations wirelessly, as well as from their phone. Both these means of accessing the internet bring with them their own potential for leaving information somewhere in the great beyond of the internet.
I feel that Jason has elucidated the fears for this topic, I completely agree with him on all these fears. My biggest fear is the idea that big brother may someday use my credit card information to monitor my purchases, or use my cell phone GPS to track my speed. I’m not particularly concerned about that, but I’m more concerned about getting a speeding ticket or having my health insurance dropped due to my chronic smoking habit. All in all, a very informative article.
Response #5: Focus on Food Labeling
Last, but not least. Marcie Barnes writes about the problems with the food labeling system, to include the lack of regulation, restriction, and requirements put in place by the government on nutrition facts. Marcie feels that nutrition facts should all be comprehensive, giving values for every vitamin, etc. Additionally, Marcie is concerned with the dated information regarding nutrition, and the disparity that exists among findings of what is healthy and what is not. Also, she worries about the growing trust in companies that should not be trusted with their deceptive labeling, and the consumer dependency on these labels.
For a solution, what does she offer? Eat organic food. That’s fine, I suppose, but color me disillusioned. In a world where food is good for you one year, bad for you the next, then good for you again (i.e. don’t eat eggs, milk gives you cancer, red wine is good/bad for you, etc. ad nauseam) I can only presume that even organic food will someday be bad for us too (I don’t know why… years of pollution have tainted the soil, and a side effect from the pesticides that were previously preventing these dangerous chemicals in the soil from damaging the food is no longer present, so organic food gives you cancer…). As for me, I’ll just keep on eating whatever’s in my freezer. Looks like chicken tonight… again.
Joking and cynical observations aside, I learned many pertinent things about nutrition labels from this article that I did not know.
To everyone else: I enjoyed reading everyone’s EOTO! Keep up the good work e-classmates, I’ve learned a lot.